Highlights
• Local planning constraints deliver poor biodiversity net gain (BNG) offsets
• Removing those constraints results in significant BNG improvements
• Alternatively, offsets can deliver gains in environmental access
Output association: LCNR associated
Tree diseases are one of the major threats to forests worldwide. As the frequency and severity of disease outbreaks increase, effective prevention and mitigation strategies are urgently needed. Emerging methods are available to tackle this issue, however, trade-offs and potential ecological consequences should be considered for successful forest preservation.
Highlights
- A complexity-appropriate model was developed to forecast an invasive forest disease
- If 15 % of trees are resistant they create an efficient buffer against population decline
- Our modelling framework helps prediction, error assessment, and scenario building
Enhanced CO2 assimilation by forests as atmospheric CO2 concentration rises could slow the rate of CO2 increase if the assimilated carbon is allocated to long-lived biomass. Experiments in young tree plantations support a CO2 fertilization effect as atmospheric CO2 continues to increase. Uncertainty exists, however, as to whether older, more mature forests retain the capacity to respond to elevated CO2.
Delivery of ecosystem restoration plans can lead to gains and losses of environmental and societal benefits, disproportionately impacting different groups of society. The tradeoffs and inequity can potentially be large when considering plans focused on a single benefit. Such information is especially lacking in tropical countries, such as India, that must balance local societal needs while delivering actions for ambitious global climate change and biodiversity goals. Here, we show that forest restoration schemes aimed at multiple objectives deliver most of the available benefits, implying minimal tradeoffs. Such schemes deliver benefits evenly across potential restoration areas, implying multiple land options for implementation. Lastly, these schemes are equitable as they deliver benefits to a large proportion of Indians who are socioeconomically disadvantaged.
Paper published in the Journal of Environmental Management examining the benefits and drawbacks of digital tools for engagement. The paper tests the applicability of current theories for engagement in digital and remote settings, finding that key factors known to shape outcomes in engagement take on new dimensions in digital environments. New considerations are suggested which make engagement theory more relevant and applicable in digital contexts, with actionable recommendations for practitioners.
This research brief compiles evidence from the academic literature to demonstrate the vital role that nature can plan in securing health, well-being, and socio-economic benefits for the deprived communities targeted by the levelling-up programme.
International Union of Forest Research Organizations has published a new report under its Science-Policy Programme: “International Forests Governance: A critical review of trends, drawbacks, and new approaches”
The scope of this new assessment includes an update on governance changes since 2010, including actors and instruments; an overview of the forest-related finance landscape; an identification and analysis of the relevant current discourses; and an analysis of the different governance designs, including deficits and alternatives.
Report and policy brief available at: https://www.iufro.org/science/science-policy/follow-up-studies/international-forest-governance-2024/
Policy brief for download: https://www.iufro.org/fileadmin/material/science/gfep/governance-followup/policy-brief/gfep-governance-followup-policy-brief.pdf
This Treescapes Opportunity Report is an example of a parish report showing existing natural assets, potential locations for nature recovery opportunities (species-rich grassland, woodland, hedgerows, silvo-arable or silvo-pasture, community orchards), and the natural benefits that they could provide. Such reports were provided free of charge to 150 Oxfordshire parish groups and land managers, thanks to funding from the Woodland Trust.
A guide for parish councils and community groups.
This guide has been created by the Oxfordshire Treescape Project team to support community groups start planning nature recovery at the parish scale.
It is intended as a guide only, rather than prescriptive instructions. If you have any queries about this document or would like further help or support, please contact info@growgreencarbon.org